« NM-01: Another Labor Endorsement for Heinrich | Main | NARAL Pro-Choice NM Presents ... »

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

(Updated) NM-03: A Tough Situation

5.21.08 UPDATE: I changed my mind about the campaign of Benny Shendo, Jr. See my later post.
***************
I'm gonna be honest. I have a hard time writing about the Dem primary race in NM-03 up north. I get many emails, phone calls, whispers and blog comments about the problems of the other candidates and the strengths of the one being pushed. I get fact sheets and complaints from the various candidates about the other candidates and how they are running their races. I just can't seem to make a firm decision to support one candidate to the detriment of some of the others and go at it with the passion of commitment.

Why? One reason is that I think we have more than one candidate with the qualities needed to be a top-notch member of Congress. Each of the top three contenders has strengths and weaknesses, of course, but I think the core values and talents of Don Wiviott, Ben R. Luján, Jr. and Benny Shendo, Jr. are all impressive. That's why I'm sad that the race seems to be heading irrevocably into negative-land in the final weeks of the campaign.

Negativity to the Forefront
You could say Wiviott's campaign started the negative trend with his new ad critical of Luján's experience and credentials, but negative stuff has been flying under the radar for many moons now, from all three of the campaigns. All three have had surrogates or campaign people out there ragging on the others for indiscretions real or imagined. There's some truth in any number of the criticisms leveled, but that's true with almost any candidate in any race. Most of them have screwed up in the past in some way. They're human. They aren't saints -- they're ambitious and complicated people even if they're new to politics.

So far, I don't see anything in any of the criticisms of Wiviott, Luján or Shendo that amounts to proof they wouldn't or couldn't do a good job in Washington representing NM-03 and Democratic values. If I consider each of them as individuals, I see mostly positives. Strong positives. So I don't feel like taking any potshots. That's my conundrum.

Wiviott
I've had an opportunity to interact with Don Wiviott since way back when he had the courage to run against Domenici for Senate when nobody else would. I've grown to like and respect him, and to admire his way of thinking about problem solving and bringing change. I like the passion, personal committment and, yes, personal dollars he's put on the line in this race. It's evident that he believes in a set of values that matches my own in many ways. And that he also sincerely believes he's the best person to represent them in Washington. He's not holding back. He's making some very personal sacrifices to run, and his positions have generally been strong and unspun, especially on the Iraq war. I think he's a can-do guy and he doesn't owe anything to special interest donors.

Luján
Ben Ray Luján has similar strengths. Yes, we all know he's Speaker Luján's son. Yes we all know that he's gotten help from his father's colleagues and friends. But by all accounts -- this from people whose judgment I truly trust -- he's done a fantastic job on the PRC and is one smart, hard-working, passionately committed Democrat with a deeply rooted, heart-felt love of New Mexico and New Mexicans. Almost everyone who's worked with him seems to have only good things to say, at least to me. He's the kind of politico that people seem to take to, and trust. He's warm and determined. He cares. He sees our future challenges much as I do. I think he'd work his heart out in the job.

Shendo
Then there's Shendo. Who wouldn't be excited about a progressive Dem from Jemez Pueblo running a person-to-person grassroots campaign? Shendo has strongly liberal views on most issues and isn't afraid to say so. He speaks his truth clearly, with confidence. Sure, he's an underdog in terms of political or financial clout, but he's making his mark in this race with a vengeance. I don't count him out and I'm excited about his prospects in the future. He can bring hope to many without a voice in government, and he seems dedicated to doing just that. I applaud him.

Why the Confession?
Why am I telling you all this? Because I just can't get down in the trenches on this one and repeat the latest mudslinging and the latest retorts. You can read that elsewhere and make up your own mind about what's important and what's not. Me, I'm gonna try to keep covering the race as fairly as I can without dipping into the negativity that's erupted and surely will continue until June 3rd. There's a part of me that's glad I don't really have to make a final choice and vote for one of them over the others.

All I can really do is hope that the folks up in the Third District vote with their brains and their hearts to the best of their abilities. One way or the other, I think we're gonna have a wonderful new Congressman in NM-03. And that's a very good thing.

Technorati Tags:

May 20, 2008 at 03:07 PM in NM-03 Congressional Seat 2008 | Permalink

Comments

Well...I read this post earlier today and figured it would have ten comments by now. I figured that because it's well-written, sums up the situation and brings up the whole "negative" thing (and having finally seen the Wiviott neg. ad, that's been on my mind).

I guess we've got a win-win-win on our hands here, and that's a good thing, but I just wanted to say I thought this was an all-around good reflective post. Thanks.

Posted by: < | May 20, 2008 11:37:47 PM

Much as I like justified negativity (see Username), I have to agree with the editor's decision to not go negative about the CD-3 race. There are reasons to prefer each of the three candidates, not all of which have to do with policy differences; to state those preferences in negative terms is tortuous and unnecessary. But we are human, and humans, as nature, history, and psychology amply demonstrate, just LOVE going negative. Look at the national race: one might think that the party that has fielded the first viable woman and person of color candidates in a presidential race would be proud of itself and giving back-slaps all around. But one could only think that if one is completely out of touch with human nature (i.e., if one believes there are Hidden Messages in water. Or in crystals.), which will always find reason to find deficiencies in differences (apologies to Rev. Wright).

Posted by: | May 21, 2008 7:29:34 AM

Great post. I agree but maybe not about Benny Shendo anymore who I read is now spreading rumors publicly about Lujan's "lifestyle." I was thinking about voting for Shendo but not now. Such smear techniques have no place in a democratic primary or any race for that matter. Shame on Shendo.

Posted by: up north | May 21, 2008 10:54:18 AM

I made my earlier post before reading the New Mexican's article about Shendo's innuendo. I have heard that BRL is gay. I have no idea if the rumor is true. Sexual orientation makes no difference to me. What does concern me is how the Republican party could turn his closetedness–if he is, in fact, gay–to their advantage. Shendo would have shown more class if he had approached BRL in private about this Achilles' heel and given him the chance to come out. I'm straight, so I have no comprehension of the difficulties of coming out, either in general or in BRL's case in particular. If he is gay and closeted, that seems to me to be a liability. I am open to hearing other opinions. That said, I think Shendo just lost my vote, which he had in his pocket, by showing the lack of savvy in this episode.

Posted by: | May 21, 2008 12:01:03 PM

Ms. thrope your comments are almost word for word those of Mr. John McAndrew on the New Mexican. Are you one and the same? Sounds almost as if you work for one of the campaigns.

Posted by: woodstock | May 21, 2008 12:57:32 PM

I'm bummed out by the negetivity also. All three of the front runners are impressive but man do they take away from themselves by going negative. Shendo was my top choice until this morning when I heard about his comment regarding Lujan. Totally unacceptable. He lost my vote with that comment. Can he afford to be losing votes with crap like that? Wiviott is pissing me off too with the negativity. Its sad, because these are all good men and each would make, as you pointed out, a great member of Congress. I hope they dont degrade themselves in the meantime.

Posted by: Taoseno | May 21, 2008 1:01:44 PM

Woodstock, even if John McAndrew is my Clark Kent, and I'm not saying he is, what in my comments would make you think I work for one of the campaigns, and which one do you think I work for? Just curious.

Posted by: | May 21, 2008 4:27:20 PM

Post a comment