« Breaking: Lawsuit by Patricia Madrid & Other Western State Officials Successfully Stops Bush's Roadless Rule | Main | A Peek at Our New Voting Machines »
Wednesday, September 20, 2006
More on Heather Wilson Undermining Moderate Repubs on Warrantless Surveillance
Following up on our earlier post on Heather Wilson's attempt to stop efforts to hold BushCo accountable on warrantless surveillance, here's the response of Jonathan Singer at MyDD to Wilson's fade and what it means for her NM-01 race against Dem challenger Patricia Madrid:
Trying to further bolster her national security credentials, Rep. Wilson has worked with House Judiciary Chairman James Sensenbrenner to pen legislation stripping Congress of much of its oversight powers in regards to domestic surveillance. But this gambit appears to have failed as even Republicans on the panel see the move as unwise.
... Wilson's aborted legislation has fallen prey to the same pitfalls that have thus far blocked President Bush's attempt to unilaterally gut the Geneva Convention. Wilson, like her allies in the administration, believed that she could steamroll her opponents by offering legislation so heinous that they could not sign on to it. According to this plan, when Democrats eventually voted against the legislation, she could portray them, and by association Patricia Madrid, as soft on terror. But when a small handful of Republicans came to their senses and joined with a united group of Democrats, Wilson's legislation, like that supported by the White House, met its demise.
Now, Rep. Wilson must run on a record that includes legislation that even members of her own party say "both threatens the stability of intelligence gathering and increases the likelihood of civil liberties abuse." I can imagine that line making for a fairly potent negative direct-mail piece come late October...
Also, a post today on the DCCC Stakeholder site had this to say. I especially like the headline:
NM-01: Wilson Folding??? Posted by jesselee
I don't think I could possibly be less shocked by anything in the world. When I woke up this morning and the sun was coming up, I was far, far more shocked than I am right now.Wilson offers to rewrite anti-terror surveillance bill more to Bush's liking [AP] ... The proposal by New Mexico Republican Heather Wilson has been rewritten to allow wiretapping without warrants on Americans when the president believes a terrorist attack is "imminent."
I assume that's "imminent" in the sense that a nuclear attack from Iraq was "imminent."
September 20, 2006 at 01:04 PM in Candidates & Races, Civil Liberties | Permalink
Comments
That's good news, but be alert, Frist over in the Senate is trying to do something similar with his “Terrorist Tracking, Identification, and Prosecution Act of 2006,” (S. 3886). Go to http.//www.aclu.org/nsaspying for more info.
Posted by: VP | Sep 20, 2006 3:01:05 PM
They are all snakes. Why do people vote for snakes? Are they blind?
Posted by: Socorroan | Sep 20, 2006 3:35:21 PM
Socorroan, good questions, don't be fooled by those being called "Moderate Repubs" their goal is to run interference and try to protect the Bu$h cabal from accountability. Most of these bills are basically attempts to create laws retroactively that could destroy any chance of "Prosecuting" Bu$hCo for their crimes (illegal spying on Americans, secret prisons and torturing). They could also benefit from using them to slam their opponents, people don't take the time to read and understand these bills and the title's are soooo misleading i.e. "Terrorist Tracking, Identification, and Prosecution Act of 2006". Someone voting against that title could appear to be soft on terror without realizing that what it actually does is allow warrant-less spying on Americans, gut's the Geneva Conventions and allow the use of secret evidence to convict detainees among other things.
Posted by: VP | Sep 20, 2006 4:09:38 PM
The definition of a "moderate Republican" is one who sits on the fence longer than their fellow Republicans before casting the predictable vote along party loyalty lines.
And "moderate Democrats," as defined by Republicans, are ones who call themselves Democrats, but mostly support Republican ideas.
Posted by: | Sep 20, 2006 8:15:52 PM