« More on Heather Wilson Undermining Moderate Repubs on Warrantless Surveillance | Main | Join the League of Conservation Voters Canvass and Meet Patricia Madrid »
Thursday, September 21, 2006
A Peek at Our New Voting Machines
This is a guest blog by Suzanne Prescott:
The September 13th election official training for the September 19 APS bond election included an added surprise - those who attended got a look at the new voting machines which will be used in the November general election. Hand-completed paper ballots will be tabulated by an optical scanner. The training leader explained that he was fond of the old machines and had programmed them himself. However he said the new machines would work well and proceeded to demonstrate what the voting process would be like with the new machines.
He said nothing about the concerns raised by election reform groups but did mention that his office had received phone calls with concerns about using paper ballots. To be fair, since the machines are brand new the trainer had not had much experience handling questions about the machines. When asked about the cost he said each machine cost $3250.00. But then a person asked how election officials should respond if a voter asked how he/she could be sure that their ballot had cast their vote accurately. The trainer verbally tap danced for a bit and finally patted the new machine's "tub" (where the actual paper ballots are stored by the machine) and said that the physical paper ballots were safe inside the machine. However, look at the key hanging from the machine's "tub" in the picture - not confidence inspiring.
They also unveiled (it really was covered with a cloth) the machine which will be used to help disabled voters.
The trainer concluded by saying the actual voting process for the November election involved many details which they had not yet received from current Secretary of State, Rebecca Vigil-Giron. He added that there will be additional trainings on the new machines prior to the November election.
Help Out With Election and Get Paid
They still need more election officials for the November election. They could really use your help. If you can help, call the Bernalillo County Clerk, Mary Herrera’s office at 505 468-1291. It pays $125. for the day plus the training session.
This is a guest blog by Suzanne Prescott, who contributes often to the discussion here. If you'd like to submit an article for consideration as a guest blog, contact me by clicking on the Email Me link on the upper left-hand corner of our main page.
September 21, 2006 at 09:10 AM in Election Reform & Voting | Permalink
Comments
Why doesn't this make me feel secure that my vote will be counted? If the people involved with the process are so lax, it won't matter what kind of process is being used. Very disturbing.
Posted by: I Vote | Sep 21, 2006 2:46:12 PM
This has all the makings of another mess on election day. Helps that we have paper ballots, but I still don't trust the people operating the system. Think about Mary Herrera.
I'm not sure if it's good or bad that the sec of state is going to hire outside auditors. What do you think about that?
Posted by: Troops Home Fast | Sep 21, 2006 3:20:04 PM
We have heard many negatives about the Diebold machines, e.g. how researchers at Princeton were easily able to hack them. What brand of voting machines are being placed in our New Mexico polls this November?
Posted by: dave wheelock | Sep 26, 2006 10:46:48 PM
Dave: NM will NOT be using Diebold machines or any other DRE-type electronic machines (touch screens). Thanks to legislation activists and a number of Dem legislators worked hard to get passed and a Guv. who signed the bill enthusiastically, we will be using paper ballots that voters fill out by hand all over the state.
Once filled out, the voter put their ballot in an optical scanner machine that counts it and the ballot is kept for future reference within the machine. An automatic audit of a certain percentage of these optical scanners will compare their numbers to the actual paper ballots. If suspicious differences are found, a recount of the paper ballots will be triggered.
No system of voting if completely accurate or foolproof, but this one is very good because theere is a permanent paper record of votes, something the electronic machines lack entirely.
Posted by: barb | Sep 27, 2006 8:57:14 AM