« VIDEO: Joe Wilson Whomps Heather/DeLay/Bush in ABQ Appearance for Madrid | Main | Galaxies of the Day »
Thursday, March 09, 2006
Molly Ivins Does It Again: Enough of the DC Dems
Molly Ivins taking in the spectacle at
Dean rally, 2005 Demfest, Austin
She's a natural treasure, isn't she? I don't usually reproduce entire articles here, but in this case I think I must. Do you feel, like me, that Molly is putting into words -- tough and plainspoken words -- what we all feel so strongly and passionately? As Molly says, "Every Democrat I talk to is appalled at the sheer gutlessness and spinelessness of the Democratic performance."
What can we do? How can we organize? What's the best strategy for maximizing our strength and leverage? As I'm sure you know, this is a conversation that is going on all over the web and on thousands of listserves. What are your suggestions?
Enough of the DC Dems, By Molly Ivins, March 2006 Issue of The Progressive
Mah fellow progressives, now is the time for all good men and women to come to the aid of the party. I don’t know about you, but I have had it with the D.C. Democrats, had it with the DLC Democrats, had it with every calculating, equivocating, triangulating, straddling, hair-splitting son of a bitch up there, and that includes Hillary Rodham Clinton.
I will not be supporting Senator Clinton because: a) she has no clear stand on the war and b) Terri Schiavo and flag-burning are not issues where you reach out to the other side and try to split the difference. You want to talk about lowering abortion rates through cooperation on sex education and contraception, fine, but don’t jack with stuff that is pure rightwing firewater.
I can’t see a damn soul in D.C. except Russ Feingold who is even worth considering for President. The rest of them seem to me so poisonously in hock to this system of legalized bribery they can’t even see straight.
Molly speaking at 2005 DemFest in Austin
Look at their reaction to this Abramoff scandal. They’re talking about “a lobby reform package.” We don’t need a lobby reform package, you dimwits, we need full public financing of campaigns, and every single one of you who spends half your time whoring after special interest contributions knows it. The Abramoff scandal is a once in a lifetime gift—a perfect lesson on what’s wrong with the system being laid out for people to see. Run with it, don’t mess around with little patches, and fix the system.
As usual, the Democrats have forty good issues on their side and want to run on thirty-nine of them. Here are three they should stick to:
1) Iraq is making terrorism worse; it’s a breeding ground. We need to extricate ourselves as soon as possible. We are not helping the Iraqis by staying.
2) Full public financing of campaigns so as to drive the moneylenders from the halls of Washington.
3) Single-payer health insurance.
Every Democrat I talk to is appalled at the sheer gutlessness and spinelessness of the Democratic performance. The party is still cringing at the thought of being called, ooh-ooh, “unpatriotic” by a bunch of rightwingers.
Take “unpatriotic” and shove it. How dare they do this to our country? “Unpatriotic”? These people have ruined the American military! Not to mention the economy, the middle class, and our reputation in the world. Everything they touch turns to dirt, including Medicare prescription drugs and hurricane relief.
This is not a time for a candidate who will offend no one; it is time for a candidate who takes clear stands and kicks ass.
Who are these idiots talking about Warner of Virginia? Being anodyne is not sufficient qualification for being President. And if there’s nobody in Washington and we can’t find a Democratic governor, let’s run Bill Moyers, or Oprah, or some university president with ethics and charisma.
What happens now is not up to the has-beens in Washington who run this party. It is up to us. So let’s get off our butts and start building a progressive movement that can block the nomination of Hillary Clinton or any other candidate who supposedly has “all the money sewed up.”
I am tired of having the party nomination decided before the first primary vote is cast, tired of having the party beholden to the same old Establishment money.
We can raise our own money on the Internet, and we know it. Howard Dean raised $42 million, largely on the web, with a late start when he was running for President, and that ain’t chicken feed. If we double it, it gives us the lock on the nomination. So let’s go find a good candidate early and organize the shit out of our side.
March 9, 2006 at 10:30 AM in Democratic Party | Permalink
Comments
Thanks for reprinting this - such great stuff. That picture of Molly overlooking the crowd gives me chills... she's one of my all-time favorite women. Keep up the good work over here!
Posted by: Maggie | Mar 9, 2006 11:53:33 AM
Bill Kass said it well. "The Democrats have got to learn that it's better to be a target than be invisible."
Someone else, I don't remember who, said, "You can't win a fight if you never start it."
It appears that some Dems are, "...so poisonously in hock to this system of legalized bribery they can’t even see straight." and others of them are so graspingly attached to the status and privilege of being a Senator or Representative that they want to BE Senator/Representative rather than DO Senator/Representative (although to be fair, there are more courageous Reps than Senators).
I think that We the People need to prove that candidates can win elections with the support of actual, live, real people supporters, who support with their time and energy, rather than big bucks. To prove that, we need to get off our behinds and be political junkies.
Posted by: Anne Kass | Mar 9, 2006 11:55:53 AM
Off our behinds is right. What I'd like to see is some CREATIVE action, not just the same old same old campaign in a box full of cookie-cutter solutions.
Here's an article from the San Francisco Chronicle that reports on some new ideas:
Putting the Party Back Into Politics
Posted by: barb | Mar 9, 2006 12:34:23 PM
Ya gotta love Molly - maybe she should run!
Posted by: Joellen Hopkins | Mar 9, 2006 12:51:39 PM
Molly's great, as ever.
And,yes, I agree heartily with Ann Kass when she says its time for some creative solutions.
Not to flog my blog -- well all right, I am sort of -- but DemSpeak is beginning a narrative initiative workshop to try to help do something about the toothless DC Dems who ll don 't agree that they should be on the same page, let alone reading the same book.
Anyone who wants to be part of the Master Narrative discussion at www.demspeak.com is welcome!
Don't worry aboaut being a writer -- what we need is all your creativity, all your insight and every ounce of hope you can spare.
Who says we can create the Master Narrative the clueless DC Dems can't come up with?
WE DO! We are American citizens, we need no one's permission.
We will create the narrative, start using it all over the blogosphere, all over the street. Then it can face the true test of narrative -- it'll ccatch on and the Dems will steal it for their own (fine with me) or it'll flop.
Somehow, I don't think this will flop:
America is Strongest When American Stand Together.
The GOP won two elections with an excellent master narrative. This is our time now!
America is Strongest When Americans Stand Together!
Nancy Varian
Editorial Director
www.demspeak.com
Posted by: Nancy Virginia Varian | Mar 9, 2006 1:07:23 PM
Molly looks like Mother Jones, looking over the crowd at DeanFest.
And she's so smart. I had to look up "anodyne".
I keep hoping that the Senators and Representatives who stand for something will break away and leave the lily-livered behind. We don't even have a party consensus on torture, do we? Or Guantanamo! I think we need to spank the Dems, hard. Can we get MoveOn or someone else to come up with a set of values and policy proposals that all Dems must sign onto if we are to support them? Why can't Governor Dean have such a list of principles and say to office-holders and candidates, "If you don't sign on to this agenda, we will not support your campaign"? I'm all for diversity of opinion within the ranks, but not on torture, not on wiretapping, not on campaign finance reform. For starters.
Go Molly. And go Barb, for posting it.
Posted by: John McAndrew | Mar 9, 2006 2:55:04 PM
I nominate Molly!
Finally, a Democrat with balls.
Posted by: Mary Tarrant-Trujillo | Mar 9, 2006 3:22:48 PM
John, I'd love for Dean to do that. But he seems to have so little leverage with the Party insiders, and most of the candidate money comes from the DCCC, dominated by the likes of the horrible Rahm Emanuel.
I'd also like the State Party here to actually hold candidates to the resolutions we pass. Did you know that resolutions supporting gay marriage and calling for bring the troops home by the end of this year were passed almost unanimously by the SCC? No, you probably don't. These resolutions are not featured prominently anywhere, and they are watered down in many cases for the state platform. For instance, the just written state platform waters the gay thing down to the Party "not discriminating on the basis of race, religion, sexual orientation, gender" etc.
I recommend Nancy Varian's website re framing mentioned above. Lots of good stuff emerges from there. Now if we could only get the bulk of Dems to support this stuff, we'd be getting somewhere. I'd love to hear Dems say YES, WE STRONGLY BELIEVE IN SINGLE PAYER UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE for instance. Polling has shown for ages that the vast majority of Americans suppot it. Instead we get "we want healthcare for all" and then absolutely nothing to back that up except for minor expansions of Medicaid.
Posted by: barb | Mar 9, 2006 3:35:27 PM
I love the way Molly's mind works. A Dem gov has been batted around as the answer to all our Beltway woes, and they'll find somebody that's so palatable to everyone that no one will remember him 5 minutes after he's lost.
But Oprah for President? just think of the possibilities...
Grassroots fundraising would certainly go through the roof. She's already done her branding. She's got a web site up and running. All the Republican women I know would clamor to vote Democrat. Oprah's Book Club could educate American voters.
The important point here is not Oprah at all - it's thinking in new, creative ways. It's about taking risks. Brain-storming. Working together to
Posted by: ree | Mar 9, 2006 5:03:44 PM
Thanks for reprinting the comments of Molly, she is right on the money. It is easy to critique the actions, or inaction of the executive branch & legislature, but the fact is it is we the people who are responsible for our goverment. I know that I have been as guilty as anyone of indifference to the political process because it often appears that there is little difference in who wins the elections, the outcome remains the same. Corporations & lobbyists run the show much of the time. I have come to this conclusion from years of watching the DOC Dems try to be everything to everyone.
I receintly read a book however that has given me some new hope. "Don't Think of an Elephant" by George Lakoff is the clearest & most enlightening review of the far rights takeover of the country I have found. It does not contain all of the answers, but provides a good foundation for a movement to take our country back. Our nation will begin to make progress again when 'progressives' become better communicators. For the most part, we do have the moral high ground, and need only learn to reframe the dialogue.
Posted by: d. rose | Mar 9, 2006 6:12:33 PM
Thank you, Barb, for all you do! This is an exceptional posting. New Mexico has led the country in voting reform-and had lot's of publicity for it. Why can't we keep up the momentum, and push for the platform we really want to get before the country, as Molly suggested? The energy is there-and the time is certainly now.
Posted by: jeanne Carritt | Mar 9, 2006 10:10:31 PM