« MAKE CALLS NOW: House Votes on Lujan Minimum Wage Bill Today | Main | Powell's Former Chief of Staff on Iraq Intel: 'I Participated In a Hoax' »
Monday, February 06, 2006
Ritter: Iran War Coming
Ex-UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter, made several appearances in New Mexico recently. Here's what the Santa Fe New Mexican reports he had to say at his speech yesterday in Santa Fe. Excerpts:
The former U.N. weapons inspector who said Iraq disarmed long before the U.S. invasion in 2003 is warning Americans to prepare for a war with Iran.
“We just don’t know when, but it’s going to happen,” Scott Ritter said to a crowd of about 150 at the James A. Little Theater on Sunday night.... He predicted the matter will wind up before the U.N. Security Council, which will determine there is no evidence of a weapons program. Then, he said, John Bolton, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, “will deliver a speech that has already been written. It says America cannot allow Iran to threaten the United States and we must unilaterally defend ourselves.”
“How do I know this? I’ve talked to Bolton’s speechwriter,” Ritter said.
Ritter also predicted the military strategy for war with Iran. First, American forces will bomb Iran. If Iranians don’t overthrow the current government, as Bush hopes they will, Iran will probably attack Israel. Then, Ritter said, the United States will drop a nuclear bomb on Iran.
The only way to prevent a war with Iran is to elect a Democratically controlled Congress in November, said Ritter, a lifelong Republican.
February 6, 2006 at 11:08 AM | Permalink
Comments
I had the opportunity to visit with Scott Ritter in Socorro. Thank You Scott for standing up to the most corrupt Government in the History of the United States of American the Bush Administration. Eli Chavez, Independent
Posted by: Eli Chavez | Feb 6, 2006 4:02:40 PM
Scott Ritter is a very brave and patriotic American. Thank you for speaking truth to power, Mr. Ritter.
Posted by: Nancy | Feb 6, 2006 8:57:40 PM
I also saw Mr Ritter in Socorro and though I don't necessarily doubt his predictions (based on current evidence) and I tend to agree with his general point-of-view; I felt and wrote in my review of his appearance that a lot of what he had to say was narrowly focused on only what he knew first-hand, or specific topics that he had personally researched.
Posted by: discreet_chaos | Feb 7, 2006 4:55:24 PM