« Dinner, Dance Event to Benefit Voter Action | Main | ACT NOW: Support Common Cause NM Agenda for Ethics Reform »

Monday, January 23, 2006

I Will Not Support Hillary Clinton for President

I seldom quote complete columns here, but 'I Won't Support Hillary Clinton' by Molly Ivins says everything I believe about the Democratic Party and its candidates, elected officials, "consultants" and "strategists." Moreover, it says it as only Molly can, with true grit, in a nutshell.

I hope you'll read the column (below) and then ACT. If we don't speak up and demand that the Party take notice of its base, who will? If we don't demand that our core beliefs BECOME the platform of the Party and that any candidate that runs as a Democrat must run on these positions, why have a Party at all?

This issue was underlined for me this morning as I read the Albuquerque Journal, which devoted a front page news story (subscription required) to the views of the Greater Albuquerque and Hispano Chambers of Commerce on a state minimum wage. The Chambers believe if there HAS to be an increase in the minimum wage, it should be strung out as long as possible -- applied in a "business-friendly manner," so adjustments can be made.

Sorry folks, businesses have had almost 10 years to "adjust" to an increase, with the federal minimum wage stuck at $5.15 an hour for almost a decade. Meanwhile, executive salaries have risen astronomically and obscenely, investor gains and business profits generally have soared and the cost of living has risen significantly. According to The Economist, American executives make an average of 475 times what their average workers make.

Not one word was included in the Journal article articulating the position of the dozens of organizations that are backing Rep. Lujan's bill to raise the minimum to $7.50 on January 2007, versus the Governor's proposal to take three years to do so. But perhaps the most dismaying development is that Bill Richardson is mostly siding with the views of the predominantly Republican business community on this issue, over those of his own Party and its core constituencies.

The Democratic Party of New Mexico's State Central Committee passed a resolution by an overwhelming margin at its November meeting that matches the provisions of Rep. Lujan's minimum wage bill.  You'd think that the Governor would be out there pushing these provisions, him being a Democrat and all. You'd be mistaken.

Apparently what the active members of the Party believe and have approved is just so much dust in the wind. Then again, SCC members generally don't have huge hunks of cash to contribute to campaigns. Members of the Chambers of Commerce, however, certainly do. Unfortunately, with way too many politicians who call themselves Democrats, paying for "access" is almost as much of a requirement as it is in the dismal Republican culture of corruption. The Party of the People? Well, once upon a time...

New Mexico Matters has more on the topic of "access." Read it and weep.

Anyway, I've gotten a little far afield. Molly Ivin's column is below. Granted, she's talking about national politics, but I think what she has to say clearly resonates in states like New Mexico as well. Are you with her or agin' her?

I will not support Hillary Clinton for president
Molly Ivins, January 20, 2006

AUSTIN, Texas --- I'd like to make it clear to the people who run the Democratic Party that I will not support Hillary Clinton for president.

Enough. Enough triangulation, calculation and equivocation. Enough clever straddling, enough not offending anyone This is not a Dick Morris election. Sen. Clinton is apparently incapable of taking a clear stand on the war in Iraq, and that alone is enough to disqualify her. Her failure to speak out on Terri Schiavo, not to mention that gross pandering on flag-burning, are just contemptible little dodges.

The recent death of Gene McCarthy reminded me of a lesson I spent a long, long time unlearning, so now I have to re-learn it. It's about political courage and heroes, and when a country is desperate for leadership. There are times when regular politics will not do, and this is one of those times. There are times a country is so tired of bull that only the truth can provide relief.

If no one in conventional-wisdom politics has the courage to speak up and say what needs to be said, then you go out and find some obscure junior senator from Minnesota with the guts to do it. In 1968, Gene McCarthy was the little boy who said out loud, "Look, the emperor isn't wearing any clothes." Bobby Kennedy -- rough, tough Bobby Kennedy -- didn't do it. Just this quiet man trained by Benedictines who liked to quote poetry.

What kind of courage does it take, for mercy's sake? The majority of the American people (55 percent) think the war in Iraq is a mistake and that we should get out. The majority (65 percent) of the American people want single-payer health care and are willing to pay more taxes to get it. The majority (86 percent) of the American people favor raising the minimum wage. The majority of the American people (60 percent) favor repealing Bush's tax cuts, or at least those that go only to the rich. The majority (66 percent) wants to reduce the deficit not by cutting domestic spending, but by reducing Pentagon spending or raising taxes.

The majority (77 percent) thinks we should do "whatever it takes" to protect the environment. The majority (87 percent) thinks big oil companies are gouging consumers and would support a windfall profits tax. That is the center, you fools. WHO ARE YOU AFRAID OF?

I listen to people like Rahm Emanuel superciliously explaining elementary politics to us clueless naifs outside the Beltway ("First, you have to win elections"). Can't you even read the damn polls?

Here's a prize example by someone named Barry Casselman, who writes, "There is an invisible civil war in the Democratic Party, and it is between those who are attempting to satisfy the defeatist and pacifist left base of the party and those who are attempting to prepare the party for successful elections in 2006 and 2008."

This supposedly pits Howard Dean, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, emboldened by "a string of bad new from the Middle East ... into calling for premature retreat from Iraq," versus those pragmatic folk like Steny Hoyer, Rahm Emmanuel, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and Joe Lieberman.

Oh come on, people -- get a grip on the concept of leadership. Look at this war -- from the lies that led us into it, to the lies they continue to dump on us daily.

You sit there in Washington so frightened of the big, bad Republican machine you have no idea what people are thinking. I'm telling you right now, Tom DeLay is going to lose in his district. If Democrats in Washington haven't got enough sense to OWN the issue of political reform, I give up on them entirely.

Do it all, go long, go for public campaign financing for Congress. I'm serious as a stroke about this -- that is the only reform that will work, and you know it, as well as everyone else who's ever studied this. Do all the goo-goo stuff everybody has made fun of all these years: embrace redistricting reform, electoral reform, House rules changes, the whole package. Put up, or shut up. Own this issue, or let Jack Abramoff politics continue to run your town.

Bush, Cheney and Co. will continue to play the patriotic bully card just as long as you let them. I've said it before: War brings out the patriotic bullies. In World War I, they went around kicking dachshunds on the grounds that dachshunds were "German dogs." They did not, however, go around kicking German shepherds. The MINUTE someone impugns your patriotism for opposing this war, turn on them like a snarling dog and explain what loving your country really means. That, or you could just piss on them elegantly, as Rep. John Murtha did. Or eviscerate them with wit (look up Mark Twain on the war in the Philippines). Or point out the latest in the endless "string of bad news."

Do not sit there cowering and pretending the only way to win is as Republican-lite. If the Washington-based party can't get up and fight, we'll find someone who can.

https://www.freepress.org/columns/display/1/2006/1304

January 23, 2006 at 11:33 AM in Democratic Party | Permalink

Comments

I can't agree more with this post and Molly's column. You never hear the Republicans taking their base for granted, yet so many Dems think we should just shut up and accept anything they toss. When Dean said we needed to take our Party and our country back, he wasn't kidding.

Posted by: Old Dem | Jan 21, 2006 3:41:02 PM

You keep hearing how these lobbyists don't get anything special, but why would they get paid so much for nothing? Do these people think we are dummies? I guess so.

Posted by: Brad | Jan 22, 2006 10:52:56 AM

The repub-lites are gonna be very surprised when they start getting primary challengers running against them, as is happening with Lieberman in Connecticut.

Also, if they think we will work for a repub-lite candidate for prez like Hillary like we did for Kerry, they are mistaken. No more choosing between the least of two evils. We want a candidate who fights for Democratic values!

Posted by: Progressive W | Jan 22, 2006 12:07:32 PM

Yes, we (almost) all agree with Molly's column. The question remains, what are we *doing* about the problems she addresses? Some Dems, with more stamina than I, have ridden the broncin' donkey and stayed on long enough to become part of the Central Committee. My most recent little thing was to send Molly's column to Udall and Bingaman, stating my support for her positions and asking that they do so, too. Point being, whether we do something small or heroic, we all need to be doing more than enjoying the satisfaction of agreeing. I trust that everyone who reads this invaluable web site is doing, not mererly agreeing, on a regular basis.

Posted by: John McAndrew | Jan 23, 2006 8:16:43 AM

You make a good point. I'm one of those who got on the state central committee. I've learned that the Party "leaders" could care less about motions we pass or views we have. They expect us to be there to applaud them and do the dirty work of campaigning, but shut up. No questions or suggestions.

We'll keep at it of course and urge others to get elected to Party offices, but its frustrsasting to say the least.

For example the SCC passed motions to require the Party to follow its rules and have platform hearings in each CD, with a platform meeting the day before the Spring SCC meeting for all to discuss the platform. The Party has refused to do these things and said if we want the rules followed we'll have to do the work ourselves. No platform discussion meeting has been scheduled this Spring.

State party chair John Wertheim has said in the media that party rules are just "guidelines." Sounds kind of similar to what Bush people say, doesn't it?

Posted by: Another Prog | Jan 23, 2006 9:11:18 AM

Molly really tells it like it is. In very simple no nonsense terms. I would recommend the following people read this; Richardson's staffers, and people who report to him, all of Bingamin's staffers and those who report to him, for sure all of Patsy Madrid's staff. I would also like to suggest that John Wertheim read this and Matt F.and the four new hires from the DNC.

Maybe if you read this it would give you insight into why we are so adamant about being heard and reaching out, and building a party which believes in and fights for democratic values.

But I predict that these folks listed above will not read this Molly Ivin's column. They really do not care, they have theirs. I have been trying to work and be productive within the party only to be mocked and laughed at. It is a shame.

The whole country is going to the shitter and our party has on the same blindfolds as the republicans. It is so hard to go knocking on my neighbor's door and say this is what the democratics stand for, when i know i am being a liar just like Bush lies. It is a sad sad fact that the dems are republican lite.

John Mc. it is hard to get in there and work with these entrenched people -- they like the way things are. I do not know what the answer is. I thought I could make a difference but am slowly fading away from that belief.

By the way the paper today said the war will cost one trillion dollars at least. WAKE UP

Posted by: Mary Ellen | Jan 23, 2006 10:02:57 AM

Ain't it the truth. Many dems are gonna be surprised in 06 and 08 if they don't start representing the people and speaking up. No way will people be working for them or giving them $ or even voting for them unless they do. give us something to vote for Dems!

Posted by: El Norte | Jan 23, 2006 11:38:38 AM

At a time when courage and creativity is needed, we get cowardice and same old same old. And don't forget the slime factor. Why should these politicians do anything for the people when they are getting paid by corporate interests to do just the opposite?

Posted by: Linda | Jan 23, 2006 1:25:52 PM

I read on an MSNBC story that Dems are already giving up on a filibuster against Alito and instead plan to "use" the Alito appointment in the 06 and 08 elections. If they don't filibuster this dangerous extremist, believe me, many Democrats and possible Dem voters will stay home. I know I will.

Posted by: Old Dem | Jan 23, 2006 5:41:52 PM

Mary Ellen,

I'm sorry to hear of your disenchantment, but it's certainly understandable, given how hard you've fought and how much resistance there is in the state and national parties. I keep hoping that a substantial group of national Dems will defect and start their own party from the ruins of the Dems, but it may not happen. It feels so wrong not to vote, to let the Dems fade away, when the stakes are so high. But it feels equally wrong to encourage them by voting - and volunteering, and donating - when they keep doing so much less than they are capable of doing. As Molly points out, what the Dems are afraid to commit to is what the majority of those polled stand for.

Maybe MoveOn has a good model: members of the Democratic Wing (thanks again, Howard) need to show up, in person, at the Senators' offices to state our cases on Alito, the environment, single-payer health care, and all the other issues that Molly has pointed out we are in the majority about. And we need to deliver the further message that we will not vote for them, any more than we will vote for a Republican, if they do not actively and diligently support those issues. And we need to make good on that declaration.

One last note: bemoaning the way things are is only human, as we are currently represented by such milquetoasts. But we need to offer more in the way of concrete suggestions for responses. Mary Ellen's idea of getting Molly's column into the hands of those staffers and such is a good one. Anyone who knows their e-mails or where their offices are located can make sure these politicos don't miss this important message.

Posted by: John McAndrew | Jan 23, 2006 11:27:53 PM

Thanks John.
We keep on working.
we change our way of working but we keep on pushing.
i wish i had thicker skin. if you know what i mean.

Posted by: mary ellen | Jan 24, 2006 11:50:31 AM

Why is it we have allowed the Democratic Party of New Mexico to move so far to the right? I am a former Democrat, and as a Democrat we accepted this strategy of moving far to the right because we had no place to go. Thomas Jefferson called for the creation of a party to organize consituencies against monied interests represented by his archrival, Alesander Hamilton. In the age of television, big money and high-tech candidacies, the "REGULARS" (35%) of party control the remaining 65% known as "Irrelevant(s)". The New Mexico Democratic Party is Controlled and Used by Richardson to further his own Political Ambitions and that is a FACT. The New Mexico Democratic Party and Richardson act (s) neither as a faithful mediator between citizens and the government nor as a forum for policy debate and resolution nor even as a structure around which political power can accumulate. The Party and Richardson function mainly as a Mail Drop for Political Money. Currently, The New Mexico Democratic Party remains organizing its members for the interests of the a FEW, not a party of constituents organizing for the interests of the MANY. Richardson controls access to Big Money because of his intimate relationships (s) with lobbyists. If the Democratic Party began to act like a real political party, the MONEY would be cut-off by Lobbyist. The Democratic Party of New Mexico has lost thousands of Members and supporters because of Richardson's Control. We all worked hard in New Mexico to elect Senator John Kerry in 2004. During the Campaign in 2004 Richardson Created his own organized "Moving America Forward" with the mission to registar Hispanic and Native American's voters. According to the Media, "Moving America Forward" had a balance of $480,000 dollars and that Balance was transfered to Richardson's Campaign War Chest leaving The Democratic Party of New Mexico out to Dry. My point is that the Membership of the Democratic Party of New Mexico MUST take control away from Richardson and his chosen few and return the Party back to the People. Eli Chavez, Independent

Posted by: Eli Chavez | Jan 24, 2006 9:26:29 PM

Post a comment