« Brand Democrat | Main | Vilsack Withdraws From DNC Chair Race - Rosenberg New Fave? »

Monday, November 22, 2004

I Am a Reform Democrat

Note: This memo was submitted in the comments section of our blog but I think it merits its own topic. Comments? --BW

MEMO
TO: DNC MEMBERS
FROM: A REFORM DEMOCRAT
RE: MODERNIZING THE DNC

Over the next two months, you will be bombarded with suggestions on how you should vote when it comes time to decide the direction of the Democratic Party. As you consider who should lead our Party, please keep in mind the following observations:

Evaluating 2004
The Democratic Party did not "come close" to winning in 2004. This is a zero-sum game and we need to measure our position against that of the GOP. Democrats would have needed a 10 point across the board increase in support to have done as well as Republicans. True, Kerry came close to scraping together an electoral vote win, but Democrats did poorly and Kerry lost. We lost. We are in worse position than we were before the election. As Mayor Gavin Newsom is fond of saying, "Do what you've done and you'll get what you've got."

Choosing a new DNC Chair
When choosing a new leader for our Party, please make your choice based on your own decision of who will take the steps necessary to modernize the Party. We must have a full-time leader with the vision necessary to restructure our organization. We can't let our Party serve as a golden parachute for those who lost in 2004 -- we need the DNC staffed by the best and the brightest not the oldest and best connected. Our next Chair needs 100% dedication to the effort and must put the Party before any other concern. Recently there has been talk of a candidate running to protect his home state's antiquated primary tradition -- we can't afford to elect somebody with a conflict of interest and ulterior motives. We need reform.

Accountability
Only by deciding our goals and quantifying our methods can we determine what is working and what isn't. We need to hold programs and people accountable. We lost and we can't be afraid to fire losers. The campaigns of tomorrow are far different from the campaigns of a decade ago -- we need to evaluate individuals by their value in a modern campaign. The railroads didn't hire the fastest Pony Express riders; they hired people who made good railroad engineers. Campaigns have gone through a similar sea change and our Party's future depends upon intelligent reaction to the new rules of politics.

Reform
We are reforming our local central committees but we need your vote to reform the Democratic National Committee. We are waiting for systematic reform, but the Party needs the grassroots more than we need the Party. We want to win and we will support the best vehicles for victory. We would like to continue our support for the DNC, but we're also members of Democracy for America and Moveon and the New Democrat Network. If the Party won't stand up for us, we know they will. We know they were built as modern organizations and a far more efficient than the Democrat Party. DNC members need to elect a new Chair who can compete with DfA, Moveon, and NDN or the party will be relegated to only hosting the convention. We are Democrats and we don't want the most moderate or least controversial Chair, we want a leader. So lead us or we will follow the visionaries at the reform organizations.

For more information, read I am a Reform Democrat on Daily Kos, the , , Change for America or Democrat Blog Swarm.

If you have additional ideas on modernizing and reform the Democratic National Committee, please email me at bob.brigham [at] gmail.com. I am a Reform Democrat.

Posted by: | November 21, 2004 04:01 PM

November 22, 2004 at 01:19 PM in Democratic Party | Permalink

Comments

Brilliant. He throws down the gauntlet to the DNC. I would love it if the organizations he mentions - MoveOn, DFA, and NDN - and others, each put his statement online and asked for signatures. This should be done before the DNC chair is chosen.

It occurs to me that the only way we will get rid of entrenched office holders in the Senate and the House is if we take the plunge in the next election and pledge that we will not vote for someone just because they call themselves a Democrat. We need a clear progressive message (as the MoveOn house parties decided last night) to which Democratic candidates should pledge adherence before we will pledge our support to them. Otherwise, we should pledge not to support them in the general election and stick to that, even if it means handing another seat to a Republican for one term, until the Dems wake up and take the progressive vote seriously. How else will we get rid of appeasers like Zell Miller (now thankfully gone) and Dianne Feinstein and a host of others who want to crowd further to the right and call it the center? Dangerous strategy, to be sure, and I'm open to other suggestions. But the DNC is crying out for a 2 X 4 to the side of their collective heads.

Posted by: John McAndrew | Nov 22, 2004 6:45:59 PM

It's very tempting to do just what you recommend. A wake-up call is definitely in order. What these apologists and appeasers (!) call "centrist," I call abandoning the traditional core beliefs of the Democratic Party.

With Clinton in the news so much these days, I've been thinking how grateful we should all be for his capitulation to media conglomerates, "free" traders and international financiers during his two terms. I can see why a Democrat who signed into law the telecommunications bill that made damaging media consolidation and other horrors possible, as well as NAFTA and other trade regulations that are responsible for the massive loss of good jobs that we are experiencing, would be seen as a Democratic powerhouse. Oh, the irony.

Way too many power Dems seem ready to blame our losses on the fact that we don't have Southern evangelists running as Dems in every race. This view of our loss props up the business as usual army of highly paid "consultants" and "strategists" who resemble vampires, sucking the lifeblood out of the genuine Democratic message. These same DLC types have been responsible for Dems losing the entire Congress and the last two presidential elections. Their prescription for turning that around? Stick to the same Republican-lite message, only more so.

Insanity is when you do the same thing over and over and expect different results.

Posted by: barb | Nov 23, 2004 8:44:17 AM

I am a Reform Democrat. Find out Why I am a Reform Democrat and join the discussion on modernizing the DNC:

Kos - www.dailykos.com/story/2004/11/29/123721/08
MyDD - www.mydd.com/story/2004/11/29/123811/70
CfA - www.changeforamerica.com/community/node/view/2056

For more information, see "I am a Reform Democrat":

NDN Blog -
BfA -
Kos - www.dailykos.com/story/2004/11/18/14187/373
MyDD - www.blogswarm.mydd.com/story/2004/11/18/141756/14
CfA - www.changeforamerica.com/community/node/view/1961

I am a Reform Democrat.

Posted by: Bob Brigham | Nov 29, 2004 2:53:26 PM

Post a comment