« Sound Off! On the Brink of Turning the Tide | Main | We're Sorry »
Tuesday, November 09, 2004
Bush Blessing, Kerry Curse?
I know there's been alot written about evangelicals believing Bush is guided by a supreme being, but a Beliefnet article provides some absolutely astonishing quotes from leaders of the Christian right. Excerpts:
“This was Providence,” evangelical leader and presidential adviser Charles Colson told Beliefnet. “Anybody looking at the 2000 election would have to say it was…a miraculous deliverance, and I think people felt it again this year.” By allowing Bush to stay in office, Colson said, God is “giving us a chance to repent and to restore some moral sanity to American life.”
Richard Land, a leading Southern Baptist who participates in a weekly strategy call between the White House and evangelical leaders put it this way: “Whoever won, it would have been God’s will.” But because Bush won, Land told Beliefnet, God has clearly shown America his blessings. If Kerry had won, it would have proved God was cursing the United States. “The Bible says godly leadership is a sign of God’s blessings and a lack of godly leadership is a sign of God’s judgment. I don’t see Kerry as a godly leader.”
Meanwhile, Paul Weyrich, founder of the and one of the original engineers of the conservative Christian political revolution, wrote an essay claiming that “God gave this President and this President’s Party one more chance…God heard the fervent prayers of millions of values voters to keep His hand on America one more time despite our national sins of denying the right to life, despite ignoring the Biblical injunction against acts which are ‘an abomination unto the Lord’ and despite the blatant attempt to remove God from the public square.”
[. . .]
Plenty of ordinary American evangelicals also believe that by allowing Bush to be re-elected, God has given the United States another chance. For months leading up to the election, many Christians nationwide prayed and fasted, in an effort led by Intercessors for America, to assist in Bush’s re-election.
Take a few minutes to read the entire article and you may find yourself wondering if we really are living in a secular democracy in the 21st century. This kind of panicky dependence on almighty intervention to save us from the boogieman is eerie and creepy, at least to me . I guess this kind of "faith" does get you off the hook, freeing you from any need to make an effort beyond praying, fasting and finger pointing at the evil ones -- those who are different, those who are "other."
Remember what Pogo said, oh so long ago? "We have met the enemy . . . and he is us." Doesn't ring a bell with these people. Why bother with analyzing your own part in the problems we face when you can blame it all on "them," while claiming that god is on your side? It's "them" causing the problems, only god can fix it, so why bother with things like stricter environmmental laws or seeking justice for all? And anyway, as long as events play out as "ordained" in the Middle East, stay tuned for The Rapture!
I have alot of respect for spirituality and good deeds driven by a conscience, whether humanist or religious, but this bunch is just beyond belief. Ouch.
(Image courtesy of )
November 9, 2004 at 05:20 PM in Candidates & Races | Permalink
Comments
Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy.
Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God.
Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
Some of the most basic of Christian teachings, the Beatitudes---I learned them as a child. I also learned that God delights in us, and that joy cometh in the morning. And there is no "them," there is only all of us, the children of God. I also learned that Good is a synonym for God, and that God is Love.
Are Christians not taught this anymore? Pls advise.
Thus endeth the sermon for today...
Posted by: foodiesfordean | Nov 9, 2004 9:01:38 PM
I gotta believe this crowd would have Jesus rolling over in His grave if He had one. This is why Constantine was such a bad idea: you wed temporal power with divine authorization and you got trouble with a capital T. Falwell, Robertson, Colson, et al give Christianity a bad name, giving out divine endorsements for whatever the powers that be do. If you want alternatives, check out William Sloane Coffin (the inspiration for the Rev in Doonesbury), Jim Wallis, Anne Lamott, Carol Lee Flinders, Dorothy Day, Forrest Church, and a sanctuary of others who never seem to be invited to speak on CNN.
Posted by: John McAndrew | Nov 9, 2004 9:38:57 PM
In "No Longer a Christian", Karen Horst Cobb puts it so well.(She's in Santa Fe, by the way.)
Please read:
https://www.commondreams.org/views04/1025-25.htm
Posted by: Nancy | Nov 9, 2004 10:57:42 PM
My Christian, theistic hero is William Sloane Coffin. Here are a couple of links to videos of this old soldier: https://tinyurl.com/4sm4x is a link to Religion & Ethics, a PBS program, and this next one is an interview with Bill Moyers: https://tinyurl.com/4waft . PBS will be airing a documentary on Coffin's life later this month, though I haven't been able to find a listing for it on KNME's web site.
Thanks for the pointer to Horst Cobb's article, Nancy. I think she makes Jesus a bit less complicated than he was (he did say "I come not to bring peace but a sword", and once cursed a fig tree for not having fruit when it wasn't the season for fruit), but I agree that the Christian Right would have had Jesus born in a penthouse if they'd had their way.
Posted by: John McAndrew | Nov 10, 2004 10:37:44 AM
Michael Feingold in The Village Voice has this to say:
"For make no mistake, this is the election in which American Christianity destroyed itself. Today the church is no longer a religion but a tacky political lobby, with an obsessive concentration on a minuscule number of social topics so irrelevant to questions of governance that they barely constitute political issues at all. These are the points of contention tied into what are blurrily referred to as "moral values," though they have almost nothing to do with the larger moral question of how one lives one's life, and everything to do with the fundamentally un-Christian and un-American idea of forcing others to live the way you believe they should. The displacement of faith involved is eerie, almost psychotic: Here are people willing to vote against their own well-being and their own children's future, just so they can compel someone else's daughter to bear an unwanted child and deprive someone else's son of the right to file a joint income tax return with his male partner."
I've heard many people praise the sensible spirituality of Sloan Coffin and WHEN I HAVE TIME(LOL) I plan to check out the links John provided and read some of his stuff.
It was very reassuring to read the beatitudes provided by foodies, just to remember that much of Christianity really is about love and kindness and peace and people in glass houses refraining from throwing stones.
We saw Bill Maher last night at Popejoy and spent two hours laughing and applauding. Catharsis with like-minded people is always healing. We came to the conclusion that one of our best tools is ART, whether written, painted, offered up for laughter or filtered through a guitar. Outrageous art! Edgy art! Raucous art! The kind of art the right is incapable of producing. With art, we have the last laugh in some sense, don't we?
After vowing I would try to remember alot of Maher's ripping riffs, I am left with this one: "Hey, I'm totally appalled at the thought of men's hairy assholes being attractive to other men. The difference is I don't think that my opinion on what is sexy and what isn't should be translated into a law." Amen to that.
Posted by: barb | Nov 10, 2004 11:18:09 AM
And I just recalled one more. Maher wondered if Bush sat there for 7+ minutes listening to My Pet Goat because he wanted the piss down his leg to dry. Hmmm.
Posted by: barb | Nov 10, 2004 11:20:14 AM
I love what the foodies came on to say.....I need to hear alot of that kind of thinking these days.
And I thought of another Bill Maher joke or comment....how the banks have managed to count every dollar....why can't we have every vote counted. Seems simple huh!? Wouldn't it be nice to have a bank say "oh well you have 10,000 give or take...we have gotten tired of counting...so lets just say you have $12,314?
If almost every person who voted can have a bank account or some account even electric bill...why can't we have these votes counted right?? the thing is we can!
Posted by: mary ellen | Nov 10, 2004 6:16:04 PM